DISCLAIMER

---

CPRL 301 NEW YORK COMMERCIAL DIVISION PRACTICE

Specific jurisdiction is the far more likely basis. Under CPLR 302(a)(1), one purposeful New York transaction can suffice if the claim substantially relates to that transaction, Kreutter v. McFadden Oil Corp., 71 N.Y.2d 460, 527 N.Y.S.2d 195, 522 N.E.2d 40 (N.Y. 1988); Deutsche Bank v. Mont. Bd. of Investments, 850 N.E.2d 1140, 7 N.Y.3d 65, 818 N.Y.S.2d 164 (N.Y. 2006). Physical presence in New York is not always required if the defendant purposefully projects itself into New York through negotiations, contracts, banking activity, or other deliberate commercial conduct, Wilson v. Dantas, 2015 NY Slip Op 3088, 128 A.D.3d 176, 9 N.Y.S.3d 187 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015); RBC Capital Mkts., LLC v. Garcia Hamilton & Assocs., 19 Civ. 10247 (NRB) (S.D. N.Y. Jan 22, 2021).

But the contacts must be the defendant’s own purposeful New York-directed acts. A plaintiff cannot manufacture jurisdiction by moving to New York, and routine calls or emails into New York are usually not enough unless they are part of a New York-centered transaction, Ace Decade Holdings Ltd. v. UBS AG, 2016 NY Slip Op 32415(U), Index No. 653316/2015 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Dec 07, 2016); RBC Capital Mkts., LLC v. Garcia Hamilton & Assocs., 19 Civ. 10247 (NRB) (S.D. N.Y. Jan 22, 2021); Bluman v. Labock Tech., Inc., 2006 NY Slip Op 52335(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 12/5/2006), 2006 NY Slip Op 52335, 600505/06. (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Dec 05, 2006).

En vertu de l'article 302(a)(1) du CPLR, une seule transaction effectuée intentionnellement à New York peut suffire si la demande se rapporte substantiellement à cette transaction ( Kreutter c. McFadden Oil Corp., 71 NY2d 460, 527 NYS2d 195, 522 NE2d 40 (NY 1988) ; Deutsche Bank c. Mont. Bd. of Investments, 850 NE2d 1140, 7 NY3d 65, 818 NYS2d 164 (NY 2006)) . La présence physique à New York n'est pas toujours requise si le défendeur s'y implante délibérément par le biais de négociations, de contrats, d'activités bancaires ou d'autres comportements commerciaux délibérés ( Wilson c. Dantas, 2015 NY Slip Op 3088, 128 AD3d 176, 9 NYS3d 187 (NY App. Div. 2015)) . RBC Capital Mkts., LLC c. Garcia Hamilton & Assocs., 19 Civ. 10247 (NRB) (SDNY 22 janv. 2021) .

Mais les contacts doivent être des actes délibérés et intentionnels du défendeur, effectués depuis New York. Un demandeur ne peut pas créer la compétence d'un tribunal en déménageant à New York, et les appels ou courriels de routine envoyés à New York ne suffisent généralement pas, sauf s'ils font partie d'une transaction centrée sur New York ( Ace Decade Holdings Ltd. c. UBS AG, 2016 NY Slip Op 32415(U), n° d'index 653316/2015 (NY Sup. Ct. 7 déc. 2016) ; RBC Capital Mkts., LLC c. Garcia Hamilton & Assocs., 19 Civ. 10247 (NRB) (SDNY 22 janv. 2021)) . Bluman contre Labock Tech., Inc., 2006 NY Slip Op 52335(U) (NY Sup. Ct. 12/5/2006), 2006 NY Slip Op 52335, 600505/06. (NY Sup. Ct. 5 décembre 2006) .

Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes; this is attorney advertising only. All information on this website has been prepared for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. While this information may constitute attorney advertising in some jurisdictions, reading this information does not create an attorney-client relationship. Your MUST engage with an attorney to create a legal relationship. Every case is different, any prior result described or referred to herein cannot guarantee similar outcomes in the future in any type of case. All visitors to this Website are informed that HENRI PARTNERS GROUP INC. works with affiliated lawyers (referred to as "Local Counsel") in various cities and states across the United States. These Local Counsel may assist the Firm on a case-by-case basis, operate their own respective law firms, are independent of Firm, and are not partners, owners, of counsel, or employees of Firm. Clients and prospective clients should be aware that when referencing to Firm's experience, this experience may combine the knowledge and experience of both Firm and its frequently used Local Counsel in the aggregate. Specifically, if and when Firm cooperates with Local Counsel, Firm will disclose the details to the client in writing for their approval. In some cases, pursuant to Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct and the equivalent in other jurisdictions, a case is referred to a Local Counsel, the Firm will not participate in the representation. In such a case, a client will sign an engagement exclusively with the Local Counsel. . Firm's lawyers are only licensed to practice state law in the states mentioned in their respective biographies. With few case-by-case exceptions, Firm's practice is limited to matters and questions of federal law and federal procedure. Firm's engagement letter and Firm's website disclaimers provide additional details.

HENRI PARTNERS GROUP INC

447 BROADWAY, 2 ND Floor, Suite 115, NEW YORK, NY, 10013

ID DOS: 6776577

EIN 37-2101905

FINCEN BOIR ID: 50000000289869

PRACTICING EXCLUSIVELY FEDERAL LAW

NOT ADMITTED NEW YORK STATE BAR